Hey everyone,

I figured this would be the perfect website to post a question (not so sure about the forum) I have had in regards to some surgeons preferring a FICK calculation to swan reading when CI is reading below 2.0 on the CCO monitor??? I have noticed significantly different findings. For example: the CCO monitor calculating a CI of 1.7 while the FICK is 2.6... Could someone please enlighten me as to why this is a more accurate reading?

Thanks sooo much!