Welcome to the WWW.NURSE-ANESTHESIA.ORG.

  • Featured News

  • Law Suit Filed Against Collier Anesthesia and Wolford College Nurse Anesthesia Program



    Weldon & Rothman, PL has filed a collective action lawsuit on behalf of nurse anesthetist interns against Collier Anesthesia and Wolford College asserting minimum wage and overtime violations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

    The law firm of Weldon & Rothman, PL have filed suit in federal court against Collier Anesthesia and Wolford College located in Naples, Florida. The complaint alleges that Collier Anesthesia and Wolford College had an interrelation of operations, centralized control of labor relations, common management, and common ownership or financial control. The complaint alleges two violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) in that Collier Anesthesia/Wolford College failed to pay its interns pursuant to the federal minimum wage and failed to pay its interns overtime who regularly worked over forty (40) hours per week.


    The lawsuit goes on to allege that the interns performed productive and routine work of Collier Anesthesia. The suit further alleges that Collier Anesthesia is dependent upon the work of the interns for its normal daily operations and that the interns worked for the Defendants’ benefit. The interns were allegedly used as substitutes for regular workers and/or to augment its existing workforce during specific time periods. It is alleged that if Collier Anesthesia did not use interns, they would need to hire additional employees to perform the work of the interns.
    Comments 183 Comments
    1. Anthony's Avatar
      Anthony -
      the "legal" remedy that has generally replaced common sense with the pursuit of monetary gains (lawyers/plaintiffs)... and youre assuming that the primary rationale for the filing is to change behavior ...again...I dont see any of this in a positive light...
    1. gregsto's Avatar
      gregsto -
      Quote Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
      the "legal" remedy that has generally replaced common sense with the pursuit of monetary gains (lawyers/plaintiffs)... and youre assuming that the primary rationale for the filing is to change behavior ...again...I dont see any of this in a positive light...
      I take you point and I do NOT know with any certainty what the motivation behind the lawsuit was. My point is that IF the intent is to modify behavior/policy/procedures etc., the legal remedies available to do that are really rather limited. If not THIS particular type of claim, then WHAT claim? Since educational malpractice is NOT a valid legal claim in U.S. courts, what is left? There does NOT appear to be a breach of contract...the students WERE educated. So, either whatever went on at Wolford is acceptable....or....if not, the aggrieved parties must avail themselves of whatever legal recourse presents itself to obtain their desired result, whatever that may be.
    1. Anthony's Avatar
      Anthony -
      I understand the limitations as you described it - but as I have been stating all along - monetary restitution is the common motivator - its THE rationale & often nothing more than simple dollars and cents.... lofty ambitions to change the system is secondary in the pursuit of this primary goal.

      I do not pretend to know the legal system beyond the basics of a normal joe - but as a private citizen - I've grown tired of the overuse of the legal system for this type of gain. An irritation exaggerated by the often frivolousness of some claims where it has (seemingly) become commonplace and hence accepted as the norm ....
  • goto new posts

  • What I Was Not Taught

  • Core Concepts Review Class

  • Recent Forum Posts

    gregsto

    ignoring advanced directives

    I agree. I do not see use of intermittent boluses of BP raising meds under anesthesia as a violation of DNR but rather part of the routine process of

    gregsto 7 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    gregsto

    ignoring advanced directives

    Your detailed discussion of a difficult subject with your patient is THE way to go in my view. And no hospital policy can supersede the patients treatment

    gregsto 13 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    gregsto

    ignoring advanced directives

    I see what you are saying...but for the previous violations of the DNR you would not have been to the point of placing the central line in the first place.

    gregsto 19 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    merlebo02

    Laboring epidural?

    Only neuro check was a check of her pupils and they were equal and reactive to light. Her breathing was well enough to maintain 100% o2 sat on room air,

    merlebo02 38 Minutes Ago Go to last post
    ethernaut

    Foley insertion certification course

    sounds similar. I'll take a pic and post it. to my knowledge, I don't believe RRCs vary in length, only diameter. but that could be just what my facility

    ethernaut 54 Minutes Ago Go to last post
  • Recent Blog Posts

    pstrube3000

    Trollway anesthesia New CRNA only for CRNA CE group

    Introducing a brand new CRNA owned continuing education group. We offer top of the line education that includes cutting edge ultrasound training. Our introductory seminar will be held in Big Sky...

    pstrube3000 1 Week Ago
  • ACTc

  • Latest files

  • Upcoming Events

  • Site Sponsors

More Information