TranMan
12-25-2006, 02:17 PM
Can too much experience make us less effective in the OR? I have met a few Anesthesia Personal that refuse to do certain cases b/c of the risks involve citing that in their vast experience, they'd been burn before by similar situations.
Just this last week a locums CRNA refuse to do 2 cases citing differing reasons which I thought were rediculous.
1st case was a Posterior Vitrectomy b/c the patients Blood sugar was 312 preooperatively. I asked him why he wouldn't just give the patient some Regular insulin and recheck the sugar later if he was really worried about it. His response was that it wasn't his patient and that he had been burned before doing this. I told him that this surgeon usually just wants anesthesia to be available in the room and he usually doesn't want any sedation to be given. He usually just does a retrobulbar block on all his patients without sedation. All his patients usually tolerate this without any complaint. I also said that this patient probably has a high blood sugar all the time anyway. The CRNA didn't really care to discuss it much and was open to switching cases with me if I wanted to do it. So I quickly obliged, ordered some insulin for the patient, sat through the case, and recheck the patients bld sugar in the PACU. Patient did fine.
2nd case, was a hip pinning in an elderly patient who was confused and pulled out her IV. Since she has poor IV access, she was sent down to radiology to get a PICC line. Now I'm not a fan of picc lines but will use them if I have too. Well my CRNA coworker refused to do the case b/c he stated that it is a contra-indication to push meds through a Picc line. ????? Frankly, I've never heard such a thing. So if you don't want to use a PICC line, why not just put in a central line. He didn't have a response for this. Well, I know that you can't infuse large volumes through a picc line quickly and maybe he was concerned about having to give a lot of fluids or blood later, but is that any reason to refuse to do a case. BTW she wasn't a really sick patient either, just elderly. So I sent this CRNA home and I did the case under a SAB. She required a little neosynephrine throughout the case but did fine without complication. I suppose she could've had pressure problems not responsive to meds. In which case I would've had to place a central line to give fluids and/or blood. I wasn't too worried about it since I felt confident I could do this with not too much difficulty in a pinch.
I guess what it comes down to is that we all have to decide how much risk is too much. And this will vary from practioner to practioner base on our personal experiences. I didn't mind that he didn't feel comfortable doing the cases, but to state those reasons to me followed by the fact that he'd been doing anesthesia for 20 years seemed a little "weak". So can too much experience or shall I say too many bad experiences prevent us from getting work done in the OR?
Just as an example of a case that I would cancel is....
Last week, I evaluated an elderly lady scheduled for a BKA (below knee amputation) who had "a cardiac event" that require resusitation at the nursing home 6 days prior. She was brought to the ER and it was documentated that she was in a wide complex ventricular tachycardia that switched to Afib with a HR of 200. Troponins were all negative and 12 lead didn't reveal an infarction. Needless to say, that was 6 days ago. She hasn't had any other issues in the last 6 days and hadn't been seen by cardiology yet. She had a few necrotic toes and this surgeon wanted to do an BKA. Her case got delayed and it was now 8pm. I told the surgeon that she should be seen by cardiology 1st since this wasn't an Emergent case and if she coded on the table, we wouldn't have enough help around. She agreed and I was glad. I felt that the patient probably would've done fine, but if she didn't it wouldn't be defensible.
What do you all think?
Just this last week a locums CRNA refuse to do 2 cases citing differing reasons which I thought were rediculous.
1st case was a Posterior Vitrectomy b/c the patients Blood sugar was 312 preooperatively. I asked him why he wouldn't just give the patient some Regular insulin and recheck the sugar later if he was really worried about it. His response was that it wasn't his patient and that he had been burned before doing this. I told him that this surgeon usually just wants anesthesia to be available in the room and he usually doesn't want any sedation to be given. He usually just does a retrobulbar block on all his patients without sedation. All his patients usually tolerate this without any complaint. I also said that this patient probably has a high blood sugar all the time anyway. The CRNA didn't really care to discuss it much and was open to switching cases with me if I wanted to do it. So I quickly obliged, ordered some insulin for the patient, sat through the case, and recheck the patients bld sugar in the PACU. Patient did fine.
2nd case, was a hip pinning in an elderly patient who was confused and pulled out her IV. Since she has poor IV access, she was sent down to radiology to get a PICC line. Now I'm not a fan of picc lines but will use them if I have too. Well my CRNA coworker refused to do the case b/c he stated that it is a contra-indication to push meds through a Picc line. ????? Frankly, I've never heard such a thing. So if you don't want to use a PICC line, why not just put in a central line. He didn't have a response for this. Well, I know that you can't infuse large volumes through a picc line quickly and maybe he was concerned about having to give a lot of fluids or blood later, but is that any reason to refuse to do a case. BTW she wasn't a really sick patient either, just elderly. So I sent this CRNA home and I did the case under a SAB. She required a little neosynephrine throughout the case but did fine without complication. I suppose she could've had pressure problems not responsive to meds. In which case I would've had to place a central line to give fluids and/or blood. I wasn't too worried about it since I felt confident I could do this with not too much difficulty in a pinch.
I guess what it comes down to is that we all have to decide how much risk is too much. And this will vary from practioner to practioner base on our personal experiences. I didn't mind that he didn't feel comfortable doing the cases, but to state those reasons to me followed by the fact that he'd been doing anesthesia for 20 years seemed a little "weak". So can too much experience or shall I say too many bad experiences prevent us from getting work done in the OR?
Just as an example of a case that I would cancel is....
Last week, I evaluated an elderly lady scheduled for a BKA (below knee amputation) who had "a cardiac event" that require resusitation at the nursing home 6 days prior. She was brought to the ER and it was documentated that she was in a wide complex ventricular tachycardia that switched to Afib with a HR of 200. Troponins were all negative and 12 lead didn't reveal an infarction. Needless to say, that was 6 days ago. She hasn't had any other issues in the last 6 days and hadn't been seen by cardiology yet. She had a few necrotic toes and this surgeon wanted to do an BKA. Her case got delayed and it was now 8pm. I told the surgeon that she should be seen by cardiology 1st since this wasn't an Emergent case and if she coded on the table, we wouldn't have enough help around. She agreed and I was glad. I felt that the patient probably would've done fine, but if she didn't it wouldn't be defensible.
What do you all think?