ADMIN
09-23-2011, 11:00 AM
Righthaven Fails To Oppose Our Motion To Dimiss
Righthaven LLC had 14 days in which to file a response to our Motion to Dismiss (http://lawmedconsultant.com/2370/law-med-blog-files-motion-to-dismiss-federal-righthaven-lawsuit)with Prejudice for Failure to Serve the Complaint, Willful Deceit, and Failure to Comply with a Judicial Order, filed in Nevada Federal District Court on September 6th. They have failed to do so…and we did not think they would risk filing one since the only reason to would be to oppose our motion on the basis that our allegations of their multitude of lies before the court was false. In other words they would have to lie again to the court. They may finally have recognized that, even for them, there is a limit to their arrogance blinding them to their stupidity.
Had they filed a response in opposition, they would also have enticed the court to specifically address their lies and ethical violations with specificity, and issue findings… (Continued...) (http://lawmedconsultant.com/2406/righthaven-fails-to-oppose-our-motion-to-dimiss/)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?a=hLD4tF7_cRQ:AekbNsQAa1Q:yIl2AUoC8zA) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?a=hLD4tF7_cRQ:AekbNsQAa1Q:qj6IDK7rITs)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMedBlog/~4/hLD4tF7_cRQ
More... (http://lawmedconsultant.com/2406/righthaven-fails-to-oppose-our-motion-to-dimiss/)
Righthaven LLC had 14 days in which to file a response to our Motion to Dismiss (http://lawmedconsultant.com/2370/law-med-blog-files-motion-to-dismiss-federal-righthaven-lawsuit)with Prejudice for Failure to Serve the Complaint, Willful Deceit, and Failure to Comply with a Judicial Order, filed in Nevada Federal District Court on September 6th. They have failed to do so…and we did not think they would risk filing one since the only reason to would be to oppose our motion on the basis that our allegations of their multitude of lies before the court was false. In other words they would have to lie again to the court. They may finally have recognized that, even for them, there is a limit to their arrogance blinding them to their stupidity.
Had they filed a response in opposition, they would also have enticed the court to specifically address their lies and ethical violations with specificity, and issue findings… (Continued...) (http://lawmedconsultant.com/2406/righthaven-fails-to-oppose-our-motion-to-dimiss/)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?a=hLD4tF7_cRQ:AekbNsQAa1Q:yIl2AUoC8zA) http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?d=qj6IDK7rITs (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/LawMedBlog?a=hLD4tF7_cRQ:AekbNsQAa1Q:qj6IDK7rITs)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LawMedBlog/~4/hLD4tF7_cRQ
More... (http://lawmedconsultant.com/2406/righthaven-fails-to-oppose-our-motion-to-dimiss/)